Officials seek stiffer penalties for tax cheats - Bonner County Daily Bee: Local News

default avatar
Welcome to the site! Login or Signup below.
|
Not you?||
Logout|My Dashboard

Officials seek stiffer penalties for tax cheats

Print
Font Size:
Default font size
Larger font size

Posted: Wednesday, March 20, 2013 10:00 am

SANDPOINT — Bonner County is gathering legal input on recouping lost revenue caused by property tax scofflaws.

It’s also pondering ways to make it harder for landowners to escape inclusion on the county’s tax rolls.

Property tax dodging is hardly a new phenomena in the county, although there are signs that the problem is on the upswing.

County Planning Director Clare Marley told commissioners on Tuesday that so far this year building location permits and building violations are at a one-to-one ratio. There were 47 permits and 47 violations.

“We had as many building violations as we had building permits. It’s rather striking,” said Marley.

Marley said the Planning & Zoning Commission asked her to investigate building location permit compliance after the advisory board began seeing a number of after-the-fact variance requests.

“We had something in the neighborhood of a dozen variances, which is higher than usual and a number of them were after the fact,” said Marley.

The Planning Department is scheduled to present its permit compliance  findings to P&Z on Thursday.

In the meantime, Assessor Jerry Clemons is consulting with the county’s legal counsel to see if state law enables the county to retroactively collect more of the taxes it was owed by a scofflaw.

“We should be able to. It’s not fair for somebody not to pay their taxes when everybody else is paying,” said Clemons.

In one instance, county officials discovered a home that had escaped property taxes for an entire decade. During that time, the county — or any other taxing district the home was located in — did not collect one thin dime.

However, Idaho Code appears to limit the amount of such unpaid taxes the county can collect.

If a landowner fails to report their property is ready for occupancy, the assessor can go to county commissioners, who act as the county’s board of property tax equalization, and impose a penalty of an additional amount equal to 5 percent of the tax for each month following the date of first occupancy during which the report is not made.

But state law caps the penalty at 25 percent.

Marley said scofflaws can also be given a misdemeanor fine or made to pay an $85 fee to cover her department’s investigative costs.

But Marley and Clemons doubt such penalties have a meaningful deterrent effect.

“We have to have more teeth in those laws,” said Clemons.

Prior to the elimination of the county’s building department in the mid-1990s, landowners were required obtain an energizing permit to prove they were included on tax rolls before a utility could service a property.

“Nowadays, our ordinance just says that the service utility has to see proof that the individual got their building permit,” said Marley.

Gauging the extent of the problem is difficult due to its nature. Even with aerial photography and other resources, it can still be difficult to locate a bootleg structure in remote and rugged portions of the county.

“It’s a number I couldn’t even put my hand on,” Marley said.

More about

More about

  • Discuss

Welcome to the discussion.

4 comments:

  • Idahome posted at 9:51 am on Sat, Mar 23, 2013.

    Idahome Posts: 208

    It sounds to me like it is not only taxes they've been avoiding, but they've probably been stealing water & sewer as well. Was this an issue before the Bonner County Commission eliminated the requirement for building permits and inspections? The current process where the location of the foundation requires a permit and inspection, but subsequent construction does not, is toothless.

     
  • WML posted at 8:53 pm on Thu, Mar 21, 2013.

    WML Posts: 665

    How about a reward system? We have rewards for other types of law breakers. The person alerting county officials to a code violation could get a % of the back taxes, interest and penalities assessed.

    Bill Litsinger

     
  • steve-o posted at 11:46 am on Thu, Mar 21, 2013.

    steve-o Posts: 44

    “Nowadays, our ordinance just says that the service utility has to see proof that the individual got their building permit,” said Marley.

    So if you intend to build a house "off the grid" you don't need a building permit or inspections because you'll never connect the house to utility power? This ordinance really needs to be updated and enforced.

     
  • reddawn posted at 2:15 pm on Wed, Mar 20, 2013.

    reddawn Posts: 1707

    This is great news. I hope those whom have lived a lie, have been a con to us all, pay back all back taxes, so the rest of might not pay for their robbery of Bonner County . And new laws must be put in place from the electric companies that we use to have when we had a building department.