Sage Dixon is not a true representative

Print Article

Iíve read with interest Sage Dixonís long and rambling response of April 2 on the Idaho citizenís initiative regarding the Medicaid expansion. Mostly he seems to be hiding the real issue by trying to impress us with a history lesson based on his own interpretation of history. In his response he states, regarding the initiative process, ďThe words Ďthe peopleí were never intended to promote a purely democratic process.Ē Wow, I thought that was exactly what they intended.

Sage and his special interest buddies in the Legislature have totally ignored the peopleís will. After six years of a do-nothing legislature on the issue of health care affordability, Luke Mayville and his organization of Reclaim Idaho finally got fed up and took it to the people to force action, only to be thwarted again by the same Legislature. In spite of the overwhelming majority of testimony by the public and four former attorney generals in favor of passing the legislation as presented, Sage and his cohorts took the side of paid lobbyists. Their cover for siding with special interest is once again to spread unfounded fear that newcomers to Idaho will taint the process and that rural areas wonít be represented. Funny, but I havenít seen one letter in our local newspaper expressing that concern or heard or read about anyone else testifying in front of the legislature about those concerns except for paid lobbyists. Jim Woodward stated in the Daily Bee, ďIíve heard from folks at home across the political spectrum that we are not interested in limiting the citizensí ability to initiate legislation. Iíve voted accordingly.Ē Heather Scott is quoted as saying the bill stifles the voice of the rural voters she was elected to represent. Who is Sage listening to? Apparently not the same people the other legislators in his same area are listening to. Perhaps Sage missed his calling and should have been a lobbyist instead.

Here are my suggestions: Since Sage and the special interest people are so intent on revising the citizenís initiative process, why doesnít he and those special interest buddies start and follow the same process that Reclaim Idaho went through to get an initiative on the ballot that will overturn the current initiative process. And they should conduct that initiative process under the new more difficult rules that they are proposing. That seems only fair. That way they can prove it truly is the will of the people of Idaho.

BROWCE HICKMAN

Sagle

Print Article

Read More Letters to the Editor

Publication of climate change fact may offend some

August 25, 2019 at 5:00 am | Bonner County Daily Bee A word of caution to publishers of the Daily Bee: The resident local global warming deniers are no doubt beefing-up their blinders after your Aug. 16, 2019, publication of ďScientists Confirm July Se...

Comments

Read More

Government canít be trusted or allowed more self-approved authoirty

August 25, 2019 at 5:00 am | Bonner County Daily Bee When you run for office and the job pays $52,000, which is a whole lot more than the majority makes in this area, you either accept thatís the pay or you stay home. You donít take the job and then ...

Comments

Read More

Let the users pay for proposed recreation districts

August 25, 2019 at 5:00 am | Bonner County Daily Bee When will enough ever be enough in taxes? Sandpoint is wishing for some recreation district and will likely ask for some voter-approved local option in the not-too-distant future. Now Ponderay wants ...

Comments

Read More

Why isnít more being done to stop gun violence?

August 22, 2019 at 5:00 am | Bonner County Daily Bee My heart is breaking to know about the two recent mass killings within 24 hours of each other in which 31 lives were lost and 53 people were injured. This must not become the new norm in America. Al...

Comments

Read More

Contact Us

(208) 263-9534
PO Box 159
Sandpoint, ID 83864

©2019 Bonner County Daily Bee Terms of Use Privacy Policy
X