Court holds firm in deadly police shooting

Print Article

SANDPOINT — The 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals is declining to reconsider its ruling against granting qualified immunity to Sandpoint Police officers who shot and killed a woman armed with a knife in 2014.

The city’s counsel had argued in a federal lawsuit filed by members of Jeanetta Riley’s family that officers should be shielded from liability because their conduct didn’t violate any laws or the U.S. Constitution. U.S. District Judge B. Lynn Winmill disagreed and denied a motion for summary judgment on that specific issue last year. Winmill held that the officers’ use of force was excessive and violated Riley’s Fourth Amendment rights, court documents show.

Riley, 35, was killed outside Bonner General Health after refusing commands to drop a knife and began walking toward officers. Riley was shot twice by officers Skylar Ziegler and Michael Valenzuela.

Winmill ruled that Riley had made unspecific threats to kill, but the seriousness of the threats were undercut by her husband, Shane, who stood calmly beside her. Winmill further held that officers could have used non-lethal methods to subdue the woman and she was never warned that deadly force would be utilized if she didn’t follow commands.

The city appealed the ruling to the 9th Circuit, but judges Kim McLane Wardlaw, John Owens and Joan Lefkow dismissed the appeal for lack of jurisdiction. The trio of judges concluded that the city merely disputed the circumstances of the shooting without conceding facts in the case or seeking judgment on the law.

The city subsequently petitioned for an en banc hearing before all the judges on the 9th Circuit as opposed to a panel of the judges. En banc is French for “in bench.”

The same panel of judges denied a request for rehearing en banc on Aug. 31, according to federal court records.

“The full court has been advised of the petition for rehearing en banc, and no judge has requested a vote on whether to rehear the matter en banc,” Wardlaw, Owens and Lefkow said in the one-page order.

Other arguments contained in the city’s motion for summary judgment are expected to be heard in December or January 2019, court records indicate. Those arguments include no liability on claims that officers used their authority to deprive Riley’s civil rights and that use of force was not excessive given the threat posed and the totality of the circumstance.

Keith Kinnaird can be reached by email at kkinnaird@bonnercountydailybee.com and follow him on Twitter @KeithDailyBee.

Print Article

Read More Local News

Parking fee may be hot topic in CdA

February 19, 2019 at 5:00 am | Coeur d'Alene Press COEUR d’ALENE — The Coeur d’Alene City Council this evening may get an earful from opponents of a recent decision to eliminate free two-hour parking at the McEuen Park lot downtown. But their protes...

Comments

Read More

Fortney seeks lesser sentence

February 19, 2019 at 5:00 am | Bonner County Daily Bee SANDPOINT — A Priest River man serving a life sentence for ritualized abuse and a litany of other sex crimes is seeking post-conviction relief. Dana Andrew Furtney argues he received ineffective ass...

Comments

Read More

Second season will feature auditions in Coeur d’Alene

February 19, 2019 at 5:00 am | Coeur d'Alene Press By DEVIN WEEKS Hagadone News Network The Lake City is hitting the small screen in a big way when season two of "American Idol" premieres next month. Auditions for the second round of &...

Comments

Read More

Man sentenced for abuse of a vulnerable adult

February 19, 2019 at 5:00 am | Bonner County Daily Bee COEUR d’ALENE — A Post Falls man accused of sexually abusing a vulnerable adult in Bonner and Kootenai counties is being ordered to serve up to eight years in prison, 1st District Court records show....

Comments

Read More

Contact Us

(208) 263-9534
PO Box 159
Sandpoint, ID 83864

©2019 Bonner County Daily Bee Terms of Use Privacy Policy
X