Open discourse can be courteous, respectful

Dear Ann Giantvalley,

I read your letter, and I hear your anxiety about the intentions of conservative voters. I empathize because I often have similar concerns but in the opposite direction. I'm hoping that open discourse can at least begin to build some much-needed bridges, and I'm hoping to allay some of your concerns.

First, as a conservative, I want to assure you that I have no desire to restrict what vaccines you get. I simply want to choose which vaccines I receive without fear of punishment, particularly if I choose not to participate.

With regard to books, I would definitely agree that you should be able to read whatever you like. I would ask, however, that you don't require my child to read books that undermine my family's values.

As for absentee ballots, we are agreed that these should be available to voters. I would also like to ask for safeguards that protect the integrity of our elections so that ballot tampering is prevented. I hope that sounds reasonable to you.

I'm hopeful that on these three issues, we are likely to find some middle ground.

On the issue of abortion, we may end up having a harder time. I am committed to protecting what I believe are innocent lives. It is very hard to compromise on that point. I commit, however, to always consider how we can help meet the needs of women facing unexpected pregnancies. And I do promise to listen and respond respectfully to your perspective.

Thank you for listening to mine.

CYNTHIA GLENN DILTS

Sagle